ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2025
Saliva and Anterior Nasal Samples for Detecting Respiratory Viruses in Children.
Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Saliva and Anterior Nasal Samples for Detecting Respiratory Viruses in Children.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For detecting respiratory viruses, a nasopharyngeal swab sample for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays has been the benchmark. Less discomfort related to sampling is requested especially for children, and thus other sample types have been suggested. We examined anterior nasal samples and saliva samples of 59 pediatric patients with respiratory symptoms and compared the results to nasopharyngeal swab samples. The collection of saliva and anterior nasal samples was tolerated better than nasopharyngeal samples in children. Anterior nasal samples were more accurate than saliva samples in detecting respiratory viruses by a multiplex respiratory panel compared to a reference test (nasopharyngeal swab sample by fourplex PCR), and it seems to be a feasible sample type for detecting respiratory viruses with PCR tests in children with respiratory symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.