ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2025
Development of an over-gap droplet digital PCR assay and evaluation of serum HBcrAg/qAnti-HBc as noninvasive markers for intrahepatic replication-competent HBV DNA in chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg loss.
Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (qAnti-HBc) as noninvasive biomarkers for detecting intrahepatic replication-competent HBV DNA (repDNA) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had lost HBsAg. The goal was to identify alternatives to liver biopsy for diagnosing residual HBV activity after HBsAg loss. A novel over-gap droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay was developed for sensitive intrahepatic repDNA detection. Over-gap ddPCR detected repDNA in 88.24% (135/153) of patients, which was a significantly greater percentage than traditional nested PCR (75.16%, 115/153;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.