Trial reportIndian journal of pharmacology2025
Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid nebulization to control bleeding of hemoptysis: The TXA-NEB randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05648656 (Efficacy of TXA Nebulization for the Treatment of Hemoptysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of TXA Nebulization for the Treatment of Hemoptysis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid nebulization to control bleeding of hemoptysis: The tranexamic acid nebulization randomized controlled clinical trial.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) nebulization to control bleeding in hemoptysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this randomized controlled clinical trial, 27 participants with hemoptysis received nebulization with TXA (500 mg/5 mL, q 8 hourly for 2 days), and 29 participants with hemoptysis received nebulization with 0.9% normal saline (5 mL, q 8 hourly for 2 days) along with the standard therapy and followed up for 8 weeks.
resultsThe mean percentage decrease in the frequency (63.9% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.012) and quantity (73.4% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.024) of hemoptysis was significantly higher in the TXA group compared to the control group at day 1 but was insignificant at day 2. However, after excluding participants who underwent intervention (N = 11), the improvement in frequency (76.2% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.049) and quantity (85.2% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.021) of hemoptysis was significantly better in the TXA group even at day 2. Out of 56 participants, 24 participants achieved resolution of hemoptysis, which was also significantly (P = 0.003) better in the TXA group (63.0%) compared to the control group (24.1%). No serious adverse drug reaction was observed. Minor cough (37.5%) and throat irritation (33.9%) were observed, which were comparable (P = 0.432) between the groups.
conclusionTXA nebulization, an alternative route of administration, was found to be safe. Prompt nebulization with TXA was effective as bridging therapy in hemoptysis to achieve the immediate goal of bleeding control before definitive intervention planned or performed. Further studies are encouraged to evaluate this novel approach of TXA nebulization. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov PRS ID: NCT05648656.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.