ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2025
Establishing a new ECPR referral center in Poland - first year periprocedural results and patient outcomes.
Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is predominantly performed in high-volume centres with extensive experience, which may limit its adoption by new facilities. However, data from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry indicate that ECPR is often performed in small-volume centres, suggesting potential for its successful implementation. The aim of the study was to assess the first-year periprocedural results and patient outcomes after launching an ECPR programme in a newly established referral centre.
methodsData from 22 consecutive patients (median age 44.5 years, 77.3% male) who underwent ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between May 2023 and May 2024 were retrospectively analysed. The most frequent aetiologies were acute myocardial infarction (31.8%) and pulmonary embolism (22.7%). Periprocedural characteristics, complications, and survival and neurological outcomes at 3 months were assessed.
resultsThe median cannulation time was 15.5 minutes (IQR: 15.0-20.0) and median time from cardiac arrest to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flow was 59.5 minutes (IQR: 40.0-78.8). At 3-month follow-up, the survival rate reached 31.8% (7 patients), and a favourable neurological outcome (a score of 1 or 2 on the Cerebral Performance Category Scale) occurred in 27.3% of the study group (6 patients). The cannulation success rate was 100%. In one case, cannulation was complicated by a perforation of the right femoral artery, necessitating endovascular repair.
conclusionsThe preliminary results from the first year of our ECPR programme indicate that initiation of such an advanced resuscitative strategy in a newly established centre is achievable, with acceptable short-term clinical and neurological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.