ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Ensemble machine learning for predicting renal function decline in chronic kidney disease: development and external validation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: Early detection, risk prediction, and personalized treatment strategies.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- An informed monotone neural network for multi-stage chronic kidney disease prediction with integrated GFR estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Signal in the Extreme: A Systematic Outlier Framework Identifies Discrete Immunometabolic Subtypes in Human and Cellular Models.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transforming nephrology through artificial intelligence: a state-of-the-art roadmap for clinical integration.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant global health challenge, requiring timely interventions to manage renal function decline. Traditional predictive models often lack accuracy and generalizability. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model to enhance risk prediction of renal function decline in CKD patients, enabling early and personalized interventions. Methods: We developed an ensemble machine learning model using Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms, incorporating advanced feature selection and hyperparameter tuning. The model was trained and validated on data from 1,200 CKD patients across multiple clinics, selected through stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory data were processed with rigorous quality control. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), calibration metrics, and five-fold cross-validation, with external validation across three medical centers. Results: The ensemble model achieved an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.91), outperforming traditional Cox models (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.85) and standard machine learning approaches (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83-0.87). Key predictors identified via SHAP analysis included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, and urinary protein-creatinine ratio. The model demonstrated excellent calibration (slope: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and robust performance across diverse patient subgroups, with a 60.6% reduction in computational resource use compared to traditional methods. Discussion: This machine learning model offers a significant advancement in predicting CKD progression, providing a reliable, generalizable tool for early risk stratification. Its superior accuracy and efficiency support integration into clinical workflows, potentially transforming CKD management by enabling proactive, data-driven interventions. Future research should focus on incorporating novel biomarkers and expanding multicenter validation to further enhance clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.