Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221509›Full record

ReviewCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2025

Advanced Microrobots Driven by Acoustic and Magnetic Fields for Biomedical Applications.

Tingting Wang, Zhuo Chen, Qiang Huang, Tatsuo Arai, Xiaoming Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Embodied Cross-Domain Intelligence in Biomedical Microrobots: A Review.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tingting WangKey Laboratory of Biomimetic Robots and Systems, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex System, and School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3799-4485
Zhuo ChenKey Laboratory of Biomimetic Robots and Systems, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex System, and School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Qiang HuangKey Laboratory of Biomimetic Robots and Systems, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex System, and School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Tatsuo AraiKey Laboratory of Biomimetic Robots and Systems, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex System, and School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiaoming LiuKey Laboratory of Biomimetic Robots and Systems, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex System, and School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0230-2742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microrobots driven by magnetic and acoustic fields have shown great potential in multiple biomedical applications due to their excellent biocompatibility, wireless actuation, access to confined environments, and tissue penetration. A single physical actuation method often meets inevitable limitations and complications, such as the limited propulsion of the magnetic actuation and difficult direction control of the acoustic actuation. This review summarizes the current progress of hybrid magneto-acoustic actuation to address the limitations of single magnetic or acoustic actuation. First, we review the research on microrobots driven by single magnetic and acoustic fields and clarify the properties of each physical actuation. Then, we summarize 2 forms of hybrid magnetic-acoustic actuation: (a) magnetic steering and acoustic propulsion and (b) magnetic propulsion and acoustic manipulation. The state-of-the-art applications of magneto-acoustic microrobots, including targeted drug delivery, minimally invasive surgery, and medical imaging, are presented to demonstrate their great potential in biology and clinics. This article finally discusses current challenges and potential developments in magneto-acoustic robotics to provide a reliable path for designing and applying hybrid magneto-acoustic actuation methods.

Identifiers

PMID41221509
PMCPMC12598759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.