Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221441›Full record

ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2025

Enhancing Super-Resolution Network Efficacy in CT Imaging: Cost-Effective Simulation of Training Data.

Zeyu Tang, Xiaodan Xing, Gang Wang, Guang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeyu TangDepartment of BioengineeringImperial College London SW7 2AZ London U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3789-2906
Xiaodan XingDepartment of BioengineeringImperial College London SW7 2AZ London U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2468-9266
Gang WangSchool of Computing and Data EngineeringNingboTech University Ningbo 315104 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5283-7126
Guang YangDepartment of Bioengineering and Imperial-XImperial College London SW7 2AZ London U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7344-7733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning-based Generative Models have the potential to convert low-resolution CT images into high-resolution counterparts without long acquisition times and increased radiation exposure in thin-slice CT imaging. However, procuring appropriate training data for these Super-Resolution (SR) models is challenging. Previous SR research has simulated thick-slice CT images from thin-slice CT images to create training pairs. However, these methods either rely on simplistic interpolation techniques that lack realism or on sinogram reconstruction, which requires the release of raw data and complex reconstruction algorithms. Thus, we introduce a simple yet realistic method to generate thick CT images from thin-slice CT images, facilitating the creation of training pairs for SR algorithms. The training pairs produced by our method closely resemble real data distributions (PSNR = 49.74 vs. 40.66, p [Formula: see text] 0.05). A multivariate Cox regression analysis involving thick slice CT images with lung fibrosis revealed that only the radiomics features extracted using our method demonstrated a significant correlation with mortality (HR = 1.19 and HR = 1.14, p [Formula: see text] 0.005). This paper represents the first to identify and address the challenge of generating appropriate paired training data for Deep Learning-based CT SR models, which enhances the efficacy and applicability of SR models in real-world scenarios.

Indexed as

Generative Alsuper resolutionsynthetic models

Identifiers

PMID41221441
PMCPMC12599898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.