ArticleClinical optometry2025
Outcomes of Vision Therapy on Visual Skills and Oculomotor Functions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Prospective Study.
Article in Clinical optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on: Vision in autism: An overlooked frontier in pediatric rehabilitation.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Critical gaps in visual rehabilitation of children with autism spectrum disorders in the Indian context.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Autism spectrum disorder across the lifespan: Dynamic symptom trajectories and multidimensional support framework.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- The Vitamin D-Gut-Brain Axis in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Bidirectional Crosstalk.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of a recess-based ocular muscle regulation training program on visual function in adolescents: a school-based controlled study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Visual skills and Oculomotor function deficits are common in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), potentially affecting their development and quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of vision therapy in visual perceptual skills and oculomotor function in children with ASD. Patients and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted using a convenience sampling method between February and May 2025. All children with a prior diagnosis of ASD who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study and underwent 45 sessions of vision therapy guided by the Developmental, Individual-Differences, Relationship-Based (DIR) model. Visual skills and oculomotor functions were assessed before and after vision therapy using the Wachs Analysis of Cognitive Structures (WACS) and the Northeastern State University College of Optometry (NSUCO) Oculomotor test, respectively. The paired Results: Among the 42 children with ASD enrolled in the study, 36 completed all 45 sessions of vision therapy. Significant post-therapy improvements with large effect size were observed in visual perceptual skills (WACS) and oculomotor functions (NSUCO). Children with mild to moderate ASD showed greater improvements than those with severe ASD. Analysis of covariance revealed a significant effect of ASD severity on post-therapy outcomes: WACS (F(1,32) = 36.80, p < 0.001, Conclusion: This prospective study provides preliminary evidence that DIR-guided vision therapy, particularly when combined with occupational and behavioral therapy, may enhance visual perceptual and oculomotor functions in children with ASD. However, randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.