Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221389›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of nuclear medicine2025

Individualized Dosimetry to Guide LuTATE Therapy in Pediatric Neuroblastoma.

Kevin London, Justine Trpezanovski, Toby Trahair, Geoff McCowage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [JMIR research protocols · 2026
    Article
  2. Theranostics Implementation: Opportunities and Challenges.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin LondonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4639-7966
Justine TrpezanovskiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-6160-5795
Toby TrahairKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Geoff McCowageDepartment of Oncology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children. Tumor heterogeneity is a hallmark of neuroblastoma and prognosis can be dismal in the presence of high-risk factors such as N-myc gene amplification, aneuploidy, genetic rearrangement, and age at presentation. I-131 MIBG therapy has traditionally been the radionuclide therapy agent used in pediatric neuroblastoma and is incorporated in many treatment protocols. The high cost and limited availability of I-131 MIBG and the required radiation safety measures are barriers to its widespread use. LuTATE has emerged as a more practical radionuclide therapy agent requiring less stringent radiation safety measures and coupled with GaTATE PET/CT forms a potentially useful theranostic pairing for children with neuroblastoma. LuTATE therapy in adults with neuroendocrine tumors uses an empiric dosing schedule with good results. However, a previous study using empiric dosing of LuTATE in pediatric neuroblastoma was not shown to be effective. We present our use of individualized patient dosimetry to optimize the dose of LuTATE in three children with relapsed/resistant neuroblastoma.

Indexed as

dosimetryLuTATEneuroblastomapediatrictheranostics

Identifiers

PMID41221389
PMCPMC12602071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.