ReviewWorld journal of nuclear medicine2025
ARTnet Perspectives and Contributions to Theranostics.
Review in World journal of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Checkpoint inhibitors, obinutuzumab plus PET-adapted ultra-low dose nodal radiotherapy yield high efficacy in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma: Results from the phase II 'FLUORO' study.British journal of haematology · 2026Trial
- Theranostics Implementation: Opportunities and Challenges.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theranostics is a rapidly growing field, providing new therapeutic options for cancer patients. Clinical trials have a key role in establishing the efficacy and safety of new treatments and determining impact on patient care. Multicenter clinical trials with radiopharmaceuticals provide robust data to support clinical implementation; however, there are important considerations to ensure high-quality and reliable clinical data. Australasian Radiopharmaceutical Trials Network (ARTnet) is a multidisciplinary clinical trials network established in 2014 to facilitate multicenter clinical trials with radiopharmaceuticals in Australia. Over the last decade, ARTnet has supported impactful, prospective clinical trials through quality activities and engagement. In theranostics, Australia has had a key role in clinical translation and generating evidence for safety and efficacy, resulting in regulatory approval and health care funding internationally. This report describes the development of ARTnet as a clinical trials network, highlighting the intent, current status, and operations of ARTnet, with a particular focus on theranostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.