ReviewWorld journal of nuclear medicine2025
Multidisciplinary Perspectives of Clinical Trials in Theranostics.
Review in World journal of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Theranostics Implementation: Opportunities and Challenges.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theranostics and clinical trials are driving the future of nuclear medicine and require a multidisciplinary approach to achieve the best possible care for the patient. Theranostics refers to using chemical compounds with similar diagnostic and radiotherapeutic applications. Therefore, the biodistribution remains the same for the imaging and therapy portions, a low radiation dose being delivered during imaging, and a higher radiation dose being delivered to the target disease areas during the treatment phase. The new era of theranostics has revolutionized nuclear medicine through the prospective phase 3 clinical trials, which have resulted in its adoption into the treatment paradigms of patients, particularly those with neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. Molecular imaging can be used to assess the role and utility of new tracers and molecular endpoints to help improve the understanding of tumor biology and evaluation of treatment response, leading to intelligent clinical trial design and more rapid drug development. Clinical trials networks such as EANM Research Ltd. (EARL), SNMMI Clinical Trials Network (CTN), and Australasian Radiopharmaceutical Trials Network (ARTnet), encourage a standardized approach and promote a collaborative approach to clinical trials in molecular imaging. Clinical Trials in Theranostics require the skills and expertise of a multidisciplinary team including the principal investigator, nuclear medicine specialists, study coordinators, medical physicists, radiopharmaceutical scientists, nuclear medicine technologists, research nurses, and research assistants. All personnel involved in theranostics clinical trials should be certified in Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Accurate documentation and record keeping in clinical trials provides validation that clinical trials is conducted at the highest ethical and clinical standards, meets the expectation of the study protocol, and adheres to GCP. Radiation safety is a critical factor for staff, patients, and the public in theranostics and clinical trials and must follow country-specific guidelines and international guidelines to ensure basic safety standards are met. As theranostics and clinical trials continue to stamp their mark in molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, it is imperative that nuclear medicine professionals remain upskilled and adequately trained in these two aspects of the profession to ensure optimal care is delivered to the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.