Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221370›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Disc-Hub: a python package for benchmarking machine learning strategies in DIA-MS identification.

Yiwen Yu, Xiaohui Wu, Jian Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiwen YuCancer Institute, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Jiangsu 215123, China.
Xiaohui WuCancer Institute, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Jiangsu 215123, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0356-7785
Jian SongCancer Institute, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Jiangsu 215123, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-6365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Accurate analysis of data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry data relies on machine learning to distinguish target peptides from decoy peptides. Different DIA identification engines adopt distinct binary classifiers and training workflows to accomplish this learning task. However, systematic comparisons of how different machine learning strategies affect identification performance are lacking. This absence of evaluation hinders optimal learning strategy selection, increases the risk of model underfitting or overfitting, and ultimately undermines the effectiveness and reliability of false discovery rate (FDR) control. Results: In this study, we benchmarked three training strategies and four classifiers on representative DIA datasets. Among them, K-fold training combined with a multilayer perceptron achieved the best balance between identification depth and FDR control. We have released the datasets and code through the Python package Disc-Hub, enabling rapid selection of optimal machine learning configurations for developing DIA identification algorithms. Availability and implementation: Disc-Hub is released as an open source software and can be installed from PyPi as a python module. The source code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/yuyiwen-yiyuwen/Disc_Hub.

Identifiers

PMID41221370
PMCPMC12597894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.