ArticleClinical case reports2025
Renal Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Renal Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor, constituting less than 10% of renal masses, and occurs sporadically or in association with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). AML is generally categorized into classic AML and epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML), with the latter comprising approximately 4.6% of AML cases. EAML is characterized by a predominance of epithelioid cells, minimal adipose tissue, and distinct histological features such as necrosis and potential malignancy, which can lead to misdiagnosis as renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This report presents a case of renal EAML in a 27-year-old Iranian woman with mild left flank pain and hematuria, with imaging studies revealing an echogenic mass in the left kidney suggestive of AML. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a heterogeneous mass with fat content. Histopathological examination post-partial nephrectomy revealed a carcinoma-like lesion with a proliferation of epithelioid cells, necrosis, and scattered giant cells, consistent with EAML. Notably, the tumor exhibited low mitotic activity and lacked atypical mitoses, confirming its benign nature. Despite the rarity of EAML and the lack of distinct clinical or radiological features, this case underscores the importance of pathological findings for accurate diagnosis. The management of EAML remains challenging due to its aggressive potential; however, surgical intervention is often the gold standard treatment. This case contributes to the limited literature on EAML, emphasizing the need for further research to establish definitive diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines to address its clinical uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.