Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Manufacturing a

Alexis Quinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexis QuinnRestraint Reduction Network, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This perspective article examines the impact of enforced isolation on the authors sense of Self. The research explores how systemic objectification and the blocking of vital "mirroring" within seclusion and long-term segregation (LTS) in psychiatric hospitals in England can lead to the erosion of Self. The paper posits that enforced isolation is not therapeutic, but a destructive intervention rooted in neuronormative ideology that ultimately escalates distress, prolonging detention. Methods: The autoethnographic perspective offers a qualitative understanding of experience to examine the phenomena of isolation and trauma. The reflexive analysis is rooted in the author's lived experiences of repeated and enduring exposure to seclusion and LTS. Results: Enforced isolation eroded the author's Self due to systemic objectification and a lack of positive "mirroring". Consequently, the Self could only be sustained through perverse connections with staff e.g., shared negative emotions such as fear, aggression and hate. With a Self-reconfigured around negative affect, the lines are blurred between intimacy and aggression, resulting in shattering implications for the author's ability to have relationships and love. Discussion: Enforced isolation is positioned as a destructive intervention, manufacturing rather than containing, distress. This perspective reframes isolation from a clinical tool to a harmful practice, contradicting therapeutic goals. Aligning with wider research, the paper calls for a transformative shift towards rights-based, relational models, such as HOPE(S), that prioritize human connection to prevent iatrogenic harm.

Indexed as

autismautoethnographyenforced isolationhuman rightsobjectificationpsychiatric caretherapeutic relationshipstrauma

Identifiers

PMID41221348
PMCPMC12597989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.