Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221302›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025

Two-step pipeline for oral diseases detection and classification: a deep learning approach.

Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo, Arnaldo Vitor Barros da Silva, Ana Rita Marega Gonçalves, Cristina Saldivia-Siracusa, Daniel Lobato Ferreira Ferraz, Camila Barcellos Calderipe, Ivan José Correia-Neto, Pablo Agustin Vargas, Marcio Ajudarte Lopes, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anna Luíza Damaceno AraújoHead and Neck Surgery Department and LIM 28, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arnaldo Vitor Barros da SilvaInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Rita Marega GonçalvesInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristina Saldivia-SiracusaFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Lobato Ferreira FerrazFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Barcellos CalderipeFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ivan José Correia-NetoFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pablo Agustin VargasFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcio Ajudarte LopesFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Rogério Ferreti BonanDepartment of Clinical and Social Dentistry, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
André Carlos Ponce de Leon Ferreira de CarvalhoInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos G QuilesInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alan Roger Santos-SilvaFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Paulo KowalskiHead and Neck Surgery Department and LIM 28, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence pipeline combining object detection and classification models to assist in early identification and differentiation of oral diseases. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized clinical images of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma, comprising a baseline dataset of 773 images from Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP) and an external validation dataset of 132 images from Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB). All images were obtained prior to biopsy, all with corresponding histopathological reports. For object detection, ten YOLOv11 models were developed with varying data augmentation strategies, trained for 200 epochs using pretrained COCO weights. For classification, three MobileNetV2 models were trained on images cropped according to the experts' reference bounding box annotations, each using different combinations of learning rates and data augmentation. After selecting the best detector-classifier combination, we integrated them into a two-step pipeline in which the images cropped by the detector were subsequently forwarded to the classifier. Results: The best YOLOv11 configuration achieved a mAP50 of 0.820, precision of 0.897, recall of 0.744, and F1-score of 0.813. For classification, the best MobileNetV2 configuration achieved an accuracy of 0.846, precision of 0.871 recall of 0.846, F1-score of 0.844, and AUC-ROC of 0.852. On external validation, this same model reached an accuracy of 0.850, precision of 0.866, recall of 0.850, F1-score of 0.851, and an AUC-ROC of 0.935. The two-step approach, when applied to the test set from the baseline dataset, achieved an accuracy of 0.784, precision of 0.793, recall of 0.784, F1-score of 0.784, and an AUC-ROC of 0.811. When evaluated on the external validation dataset, it yielded an accuracy of 0.863, precision of 0.879, recall of 0.863, F1-score of 0.866, and an AUC-ROC of 0.934. The visual inspection of YOLO's inference outputs confirmed consistent lesion localization across diverse oral cavity images, with some missing (17.4%). The t-SNE visualization demonstrated partial separation between oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) feature embeddings, indicating the model captured discriminative patterns with some class overlap. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of a two-step artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline combining object detection and classification to support early diagnosis of oral diseases. However, caution is warranted when interpreting the results of two-step approaches, as images missed by YOLO during detection are excluded from the classification stage, which may affect the reported performance metrics.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceimage classificationobject detectionoral potentially malignant disordersoral squamous cell carcinomapre-training

Identifiers

PMID41221302
PMCPMC12599429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.