ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Beyond supermarkets: ethnic stores, food environments, and the limits of the Food Access Research Atlas.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Food Access Research Atlas (FARA) is a nationally used measure for community food environment that informs resource allocation to improve food access and population health. However, because FARA flags census tracts (CTs) as low-access solely based on CT population's proximity to supermarkets, it assumes supermarkets as the gold standard of food stores and may not adequately capture the food environments in racial minority neighborhoods, where ethnic stores can play a critical role. Objective: To examine the accuracy of FARA and its underlying assumption by comparing FARA with our novel Google Maps-based Measure and evaluating the healthfulness of diverse food store types with our multi-ethnic compilation of Nutritional Environment Measures Survey (NEMS). Methods: This cross-sectional study in Durham, North Carolina, leveraged Google Maps to develop three CT-level variables for food store access (intensity, per capita count, and density) and compared them between low-access and not-low-access CTs classified by FARA. This study then developed the first multi-ethnic NEMS compilation and conducted it among small, large, conventional, and ethnic food stores in Durham to evaluate their respective ability to provide healthy, affordable, and quality food. Results: The geographic distribution of low-access CTs was not consistent with that of CT-level store count. The intensity, per capita count, and density of large stores and ethnic stores did not significantly differ between low-access and not-low-access CTs. From NEMS, ethnic and large food stores could provide healthier, more affordable, and higher quality food than conventional and small food stores. Conclusion: By highlighting FARA's limitations in measuring community food environment and casting doubt on FARA's underlying assumption, this study highlights the need to shift the discourse away from the binary narrative that a lack of supermarkets equals a food desert, and instead examine the food access provided by existing networks of grocery stores, particularly ethnic stores in minority neighborhoods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.