Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221225›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Knowledge translation of climate change research into public health action: a scoping review.

Chanelle Mulopo, Nyamongo Onkoba, Samuel Abimbola, Ezgi Baltaci, Caradee Y Wright, Bey-Marrie Schmidt

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chanelle MulopoCentre for Epidemic Response and Innovation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Nyamongo OnkobaDepartment of Biomedical and Health Sciences, The Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Samuel AbimbolaCyprus International Institute of Environmental and Public Health, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Ezgi BaltaciDivision Policy and Implementation Research for Cancer Prevention, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Caradee Y WrightClimate Change and Health Research Programme, Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Bey-Marrie SchmidtSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are gaps in translating climate change research into public health action at the global level. Knowledge translation refers to the methods used to bridge the gap between knowledge and action. Given the significant impacts of climate change on health, it is essential to integrate climate research into health decision-making processes. This integration ensures that evidence effectively informs policies and practices at all levels, leading to more timely, equitable, and impactful public health responses. Objective: This scoping review examines key approaches and identifies gaps in knowledge translation methods for integrating climate change research into public health decision-making. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus using a predefined search string to identify studies on climate change and health published between January 1, 2003, and March 1, 2024, with no geographic restrictions. Retrieved articles were screened and data extracted using Covidence software. Thematic analysis was performed in ATLAS.TI employing Braun and Clark's six-step method. The identified knowledge translation approaches were categorized according to the Cochrane Knowledge Translation Framework. Findings: Our findings highlight five primary knowledge translation approaches: (1) monitoring the coverage of climate change and health across media, scientific literature, and government responses; (2) engaging citizens of all ages in participatory activities to address local climate challenges and co-develop policy solutions; (3) integrating knowledge generation, synthesis, and dissemination for effective communication; (4) emphasizing advocacy and education to foster collaborations and gain support from decision-makers; and (5) leveraging health impact assessment tools to guide decision-making related to climate change and health. Nonetheless, we did not find any primary studies on climate change research and knowledge translation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Conclusion: There is a need for primary studies on the knowledge translation of climate change research, especially in relation to adaptation, into meaningful public health actions that can inform decision-making and contribute to building climate-resilient health systems in LMICs.

Indexed as

Climate ChangePublic HealthTranslational Research, BiomedicalDecision MakingHumansclimate change and healthevidence-informed decision-makingknowledge to actionknowledge translationpublic health policy

Identifiers

PMID41221225
PMCPMC12597920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.