Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221195›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The cognitive impacts of Chinese pinyin learning on English-speaking elementary students in a bilingual educational setting.

Jingzhi Liu, Hao Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingzhi LiuSchool of International Education, Nanjing University of the Arts, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Hao BaiCollege of Information Engineering, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou, Hainan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of limited Chinese pinyin learning on American elementary school students' language performance, with particular emphasis on potential cross-linguistic interference and the benefits of pinyin learning. Participants from two schools, one receiving Chinese instruction including pinyin (experimental group) and one with no Chinese instruction (control group), in first and fourth grades were assessed on measures of Nonverbal Ability (NA), Phonological Awareness (PA), the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4), Chinese Fluency Test (CFT), Commonly Mispronounced Chinese Words Read Aloud Test (CMCT), and Commonly Mispronounced English Words Read Aloud Test (CMET). Results indicated that the modest exposure to pinyin, delivered as five 30-min sessions per three weeks, did not significantly interfere with the acquisition of English vocabulary, as evidenced by comparable performance on PPVT-4 and CMET across groups. In first grade, CMCT was positively correlated with NA, PA, and CMET, while in fourth grade, significant correlations were observed only with CMET and CFT. Furthermore, error analyses revealed that the majority of mis- pronunciations were attributable to intrinsic properties of the English language rather than to negative transfer from pinyin instruction. These differential patterns suggest that a developmental shift in how Chinese pinyin interacts with students' cognitive and linguistic abilities across grade levels, the most effective period for introducing pinyin instruction appears to be around the first grade, when phonological systems are still developing, while by fourth grade, when these systems are largely consolidated, the cognitive benefits of pinyin learning become less direct, although early pinyin skills then appear to support vocabulary acquisition.

Indexed as

bilingual elementary learnersbiliteracy developmentChinese pinyincross-linguistic interferencephonological awarenesssecond language acquisition

Identifiers

PMID41221195
PMCPMC12597923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.