ArticleInternational journal of coal science & technology2025
Field study demonstrates inordinate respirable dust generation during continuous mining in rock versus coal strata.
Article in International journal of coal science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In modern room and pillar coal mines, the coal is produced by continuous miner (CM) machines. The CM is used to mine the coal seam by continuously cutting at a vertical face. Depending on the seam thickness, quality, and geotechnical properties, some roof, floor, or interburden rock is often cut along with coal. While CMs can be highly efficient in terms of production rates, they can also generate high concentrations of dust. Dust poses both safety (i.e., explosibility) and respiratory health hazards. Previous research has generally indicated that CM cutting in rock yields much more respirable dust than cutting in coal. Although in-mine studies that directly evaluate this trend have not been reported, understanding relative dust generation from different geologic strata could have important implications. In many mines, for instance, the rock is the primary source of respirable silica and silicates, which can be especially hazardous. To mitigate dust generated by the CM, mines use a variety of controls including ventilation, on-board scrubber systems, and water sprays. However, the relative effects of controls on dust generated from different strata have also not been widely investigated. In this field study, respirable dust sampling was conducted in the intake and return airways of an active CM during periods when the cutting was targeted either primarily at the coal seam (bottom cut) or primarily at the roof rock (top cut) in a standard entry. Results indicated that CM cutting in rock strata generated somewhat finer particles and respirable dust concentrations that were 2.1-26 times higher than cutting in coal strata, although the coal height being cut was about 2.2-2.9 times greater than the rock height. Additionally, the analysis of dust mineralogy generally showed a mix of both carbonaceous (coal) and mineral particles regardless of the target strata. Furthermore, the study was designed to evaluate the effects of two typical combinations of CM scrubber and ventilation conditions, and increased pressure and volume through the CM water sprays. In general, operation of the scrubber tended to yield lower and somewhat finer respirable dust concentrations, irrespective of the strata the CM was targeting. Increased water spray pressure and volume sometimes appeared to reduce the respirable dust concentration when the CM was targeting the roof rock, but no effect could be discerned when the CM was targeting the coal seam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.