ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2025
Post-authorisation effectiveness and safety study: a multicenter observational study of the effectiveness and safety of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.
Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anti-SARS-CoV-2 response in alveolar blood sample and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of individuals vaccinated with inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the rapid development of vaccines to control the spread of infection. The inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Sinopharm BIBP vaccine was introduced in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and registered by the Ministry of Health and Prevention before the final data of the phase III clinical trial was released. Hence, a post-authorization effectiveness and safety study was required to evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of the vaccine. Materials and Methods: An observational Phase IV study was conducted in Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, UAE, for 18 months. The effectiveness of the BIBP vaccine was evaluated in individuals who received at least the first 2 doses and those who received the full vaccine course (with booster dose) based on immunogenicity assessment of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and protection against COVID-19. Results: About 96% of the participants showed positive results for the neutralizing antibody and anti-S antibody against the SARS-CoV-2, 14 days after the second dose of the vaccine. The participants showed similar positive results after the booster vaccine, and the antibodies remained at that level at the one-year follow-up. Only 16 participants who received at least one dose of the vaccine experienced COVID-19. Safety outcomes showed that all serious adverse events reported were unrelated to the vaccine. No death was reported in this study period. Conclusion: The inactivated BIBP Sinopharm vaccine proved safe and effective in protecting against COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.