ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Splenic rupture as a rare colonoscopy complication: a case report with clinical and medico-legal insights.
Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Splenic rupture is an exceedingly rare but potentially life-threatening complication of colonoscopy, with an estimated incidence of less than 1 in 100,000 procedures and a reported mortality rate of up to 5%. Due to its non-specific and often subtle clinical presentation-typically involving left upper quadrant or generalized abdominal pain-it may be misdiagnosed or diagnosed late, which can result in a significant worsening of patient outcomes. Early recognition and prompt management are therefore essential not only for improving clinical prognosis but also for preventing potential medico-legal disputes related to diagnostic delays or alleged procedural negligence. Raising awareness among clinicians of this rare complication, especially in the presence of risk factors such as difficult colonoscopy, adhesions, or splenomegaly, is of critical importance. Case Description: A 68-year-old woman underwent a routine colonoscopy for recurrent polyps. The procedure was uneventful, and she was discharged with post-procedural instructions. The following day, she developed persistent abdominal pain, initially treated with analgesics. Progression to hypotension and abdominal distension prompted emergency imaging, revealing hemoperitoneum due to splenic rupture. An emergent splenectomy was performed, confirming multiple splenic lacerations. The patient recovered fully postoperatively with supportive management. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for splenic injury in patients presenting with delayed abdominal pain after colonoscopy. Detailed informed consent, strict post-procedural monitoring, and patient education are essential for minimizing complications and addressing medico-legal challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.