ArticleEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England)2025
A survey of UK-based screening and surveillance practices for carcinoid heart disease in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.
Article in Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Symptoms of carcinoid heart disease (CHD) can be subtle or absent even in advanced disease; therefore screening for CHD is important in the management of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Previous data in 2015 demonstrated variation in screening practices in the United Kingdom and Ireland; since then, consensus guidelines and European recommendations have been published on screening for CHD and surveillance in patients with NETs. We aimed to repeat the survey to compare current practice with the previous study. Eighteen NET centres caring for over 4,500 patients completed an online questionnaire on their patient population, CHD screening and surveillance practices, and the role of the multidisciplinary team. Screening occurred in all centres, including clinical examination in 56% of centres compared with 68% previously; all centres used biomarkers compared with 50% in 2015. Echocardiography was performed at varying frequency, mainly at baseline and repeated when biomarkers were abnormal (35%), compared with baseline in 21% previously. The timing of echocardiographic surveillance in established CHD remains varied: 6-monthly in 39%, annually in 17%, and according to cardiology input and individual patient context in 44%; compared with a variety of timings in 2015, ranging from less than 6-monthly to annually. The MDT included a cardiologist in 44% of centres compared with 50% previously, and 22% made cardiology referrals to a regional centre for CHD. Our findings suggest that although screening for and surveillance of CHD in the UK have improved, variation persists, which may contribute to late presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.