ReviewChemical science2025
Chemical probes for enzyme imaging: challenges in design, synthesis and biomedical applications.
Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An amplification-free fluorescence turn-on sensing platform for in situ monitoring miRNA release from live cells.Talanta open · 2026Article
- Recent advances in chemiluminescence probes for Tumor microenvironment with applications in cancer diagnosis and therapy.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- Near-infrared light-controlled catalytic hairpin assembly fluorescent biosensor for the sensitive and specific detection of fibroblast activation protein.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Development and preclinical evaluation of selective vinyl sulfone-based probes for PET imaging of tumor-associated cathepsins.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026Article
- A FRET Aptasensor Based on N-CQDs for Detection of Cardiac Troponin I in Acute Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzymes play central roles in cellular regulation, disease progression, and therapeutic response, making them ideal targets for diagnostic and therapeutic chemical probes. Among them, proteases and kinases are particularly valuable due to their dysregulation in cancer, immune disorders, and infectious diseases. In this Perspective, we highlight recent advances in chemical probe development aimed at these enzyme families, with a focus on imaging modalities and translational potential. Kinase-targeted probes are frequently derived from clinically approved inhibitors, facilitating their repurposing for diagnostic applications. In contrast, protease-responsive probes rely on detailed substrate specificity profiling, where the incorporation of unnatural amino acids serves as a key strategy for achieving selectivity and stability in biological systems. We explore the broad landscape of probe modalities, including activatable fluorescent substrates, PET tracers, and mass cytometry-compatible metal-tagged reagents, that collectively enable sensitive, real-time, and multiplexed analysis of enzyme function in cells and tissues. Notably, enzyme-activated theranostic systems are emerging that couple imaging with targeted drug release, expanding the functional scope of chemical probes beyond detection. We also discuss how artificial intelligence is beginning to support the design process, from structure prediction and binding affinity modeling to the generation of novel chemical scaffolds with favorable pharmacological properties. With several enzyme-targeted probes now in clinical trials or approved for human use, this field exemplifies the success of translational chemical biology and the potential of chemical tools to directly impact patient care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.