ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2025
Can the Combination of White Blood Cell Count and C-Reactive Protein Rule Out Pediatric Appendicitis, a Retrospective Analysis?
Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Two Antibiotic Combinations for Conservative Treatment of Non-Complicated Appendicitis in Children.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric appendicitis (PA) is the most frequent cause of pediatric emergency surgery. Standard PA scoring systems incorporate inflammatory biomarkers (white blood cell count [WBC] or C-reactive protein [CRP]); however, the individual biomarker sensitivities have not been reported beyond single-center sites. We aimed to measure the individual and combined sensitivities of WBC and CRP to rule out PA in a large multicenter hospital system. Methods: We did a retrospective study of pediatric emergency department patients (age <18) with abdominal pain, using a deidentified electronic health database from a 175-hospital system in the United States, comparing PA versus non-PA patients. Pediatric appendicitis patients were identified by ICD-10 diagnosis codes and had advanced imaging, whereas non-PA patients had advanced imaging and were discharged home with the ICD-10 code for abdominal pain. Using matched propensity matching, we calculated receiver operator characteristics and Youden's index to find the optimal cutpoints. Sensitivity was calculated at the optimal and traditional cutpoints for each biomarker, also combined in parallel fashion. Results: We identified 7414 subjects (3707 PA matched to 3707 controls). The WBC in PA patients was 14.99 ± 5.00 k/mm Conclusion: The PA patients in our study had significantly higher inflammatory biomarkers than the non-PA patients. Combining WBC less than 10.0 k/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.