Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221071›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2025

The MAHEC Research Certificate Program: A Brief and Introductory Exposure to Key Research Topics for Diverse Learners.

Grace E Flinchum, Emily S Mazure, Chelsea C Atkins, Wendy Nuzzo, C Micha Belden, Edward C Jauch, Jacqueline R Halladay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grace E FlinchumSheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Emily S MazureUniversity Libraries, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, Virgina.
Chelsea C AtkinsDepartment of Program Evaluation and Research, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
Wendy NuzzoDepartment of Program Evaluation and Research, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
C Micha BeldenDepartment of Program Evaluation and Research, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
Edward C JauchDepartment of Program Evaluation and Research, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
Jacqueline R HalladayDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research is a core component of health profession training programs, but few efficient training resources exist that provide introductory research training that is brief, freely accessible, and supportive of learners with varying levels of research experience. Methods: We set out to create the Mountain Area Health Education Center (MAHEC) Research Certificate program to support Graduate Medical Education (GME) residents and other learners. We initially explored existing curricula used to instruct medical and doctor of pharmacy students in order to identify foundational research topics to include in our introductory research program. We were guided by stakeholders to create a curriculum for interdisciplinary learners that avoided costs to the user, kept learning sessions under 30 minutes, could be fully completed online, and could be incorporated into larger research courses. We created 8 modules by vetting freely available online resources or produced original content if existing resources were deemed inadequate. Additionally, we developed our evaluation processes. Results: The MAHEC Research Certificate Curriculum was implemented, and several GME programs, and other educational programs, incorporated the modules into their research curriculum. Preliminary results demonstrate that learner confidence on all 8 research topics improved after module completion. Overall, participants were highly satisfied with the curriculum and were likely to recommend the modules to peers. Conclusion: This research curriculum fills a need for a free, brief, accessible, and asynchronous online research training program for learners. The curriculum can be used to supplement existing research didactic training in professional programs, to support researchers reviewing specific research topics, and/or to introduce research concepts to inexperienced researchers, all of whom can receive an automatically generated certificate of completion.

Indexed as

certificate programcurriculumeducationGMEgraduategraduate medical educationinternship and residencymedicalresearchscholarly activity

Identifiers

PMID41221071
PMCPMC12600048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.