ReviewHCA healthcare journal of medicine2025
Beyond the Norm: Decoding Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection as an Unusual Cause of Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Review in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Description Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare nonatherosclerotic cause of myocardial infarction among young women, particularly during pregnancy. As the name suggests, SCAD is caused by the spontaneous formation of the false lumen within the coronary artery wall, thus compromising the blood flow to the myocardium. Unlike atherosclerotic acute coronary syndromes, SCAD is not directly associated with diabetes or hypertension; moreover, underlying connective tissue defects and inflammation are considered more contributory towards its etiology. Although its pathophysiology is not well understood, multiple theories have been proposed. Clinically, SCAD has a similar presentation to acute coronary syndromes, including substernal chest pain, elevated cardiac enzymes, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and T wave changes on the ECG. Due to its elusive etiology, variable clinical presentation, and potential for catastrophic outcomes, it is essential to make a proper diagnosis using tools such as coronary angiography, optical coherence tomographic imaging, intravascular ultrasound, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. In this article, we review the current understanding of SCAD, encompassing its epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic and management options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.