Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41221041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Comparative study between calcium gluconate with diosmin, cabergoline, and cabergoline with diosmin in prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high-risk women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures.

Aya M Abdallah, Amal K Hussien, Sumaiah J Alarfaj, Thanaa A Elmasry, Marwa Kamal, Hatem Sarhan, Mohammed H Mosbeh, Eman Mohamed Sadek

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06333691 (Comparative Study Between Calcium Gluconate With Diosmin, Cabergoline and Cabergoline With Diosmin in Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in High-risk Women Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06333691 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Study Between Calcium Gluconate With Diosmin, Cabergoline and Cabergoline With Diosmin in Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in High-risk Women Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinia UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled180ConditionsOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeArmsCalcium Gluconate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aya M AbdallahDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Amal K HussienDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Sumaiah J AlarfajDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Thanaa A ElmasryPharmacology and Toxicology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Marwa KamalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Fayoum University , Fayoum , Egypt.
Hatem SarhanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Mohammed H MosbehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Eman Mohamed SadekDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ovarian Hyper-stimulation Syndrome (OHSS) is the main iatrogenic problem linked to ovarian stimulation with reproductive medications. Increased vascular permeability is considered the cause of OHSS. It leads to excess fluid flowing from blood vessels into surrounding tissue. Serious consequences include imbalances in electrolytes and impairment of the heart, liver, and kidneys. Objectives: This study aims to the comparison of the efficacy of calcium gluconate and diosmin combination, cabergoline alone, and a combination of cabergoline and diosmin in preventing OHSS in high-risk individuals undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures. Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, interventional study was carried out on 180 high-risk females for OHSS. They were divided into three groups, each with 60 women: Group A received IV infusion of calcium gluconate and diosmin. Group B received cabergoline alone. Group C received cabergoline and diosmin. Patients were regularly evaluated using clinical examinations and ultrasound to check for signs of OHSS. The main outcome was the frequency of moderate to severe OHSS. Secondary outcomes were the rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth. Results: The research demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the prevalence of mild OHSS among the three groups (p-value = 0.91for each). Nevertheless, the three groups showed a notable difference in the occurrence of moderate OHSS (p = 0.044) respectively. Notably, severe ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome wasn't observed in Group C. However, 13.3% of patients in Group B and 6.6% in Group A were affected with a highly significant difference (p = 0.007). The chemical and clinical pregnancy rates across the three groups did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences (p-value of 0.53), (p-value of 0.17) correspondingly). Conclusion: Our study found that using cabergoline and diosmin together in high-risk females undergoing ICSI procedures was significantly more successful in preventing OHSS compared to using calcium gluconate and diosmin or cabergoline alone. This combination did not impact miscarriage, pregnancy rate, or the likelihood of multiple pregnancy. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier NCT06333691.

Indexed as

cabergolinecalcium gluconatediosminhCGovarian hyperstimulation

Identifiers

PMID41221041
PMCPMC12598027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.