ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation vs. craniotomy in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective comparative study on surgical efficiency and long-term functional outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of neuroendoscopic surgery on surgical efficiency and long-term functional outcomes in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted on a cohort of 60 patients diagnosed with HICH who were admitted to Ganzhou People's Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique employed: neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation (NEHE, Results: The NEHE group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in surgical efficiency and safety. Specifically, the operative time was reduced by 25% (93.75 ± 10.56 min vs. 124.66 ± 21.71 min, Conclusion: In summary, our findings affirm that NEHE provides superior surgical outcomes and a favorable safety profile in the management of HICH, with significant improvements noted in long-term quality of life and motor function. The results advocate for the adoption of NEHE as a primary approach for HICH cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.