ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Community-associated Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Case Investigations in New York City.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community-associated carbapenem-resistant organisms (CA-CRO) are a growing concern. The New York City (NYC) Health Department sought to characterize CA-CRO in NYC. Methods: CA-CRO cases were gram-negative carbapenem-resistant bacteria, cultured from urine or skin, collected December 2020-May 2023 among NYC residents aged ≤70 years with no international travel, hospitalizations, or long-term care facility stays within 12 months before specimen collection, regardless of infection or symptom status. Data were from laboratory-based surveillance, medical records, and patient interviews. Sequencing was conducted to explore potential genomic clustering. Results: Among 114 patients eligible after chart review, 75 were reached for screening. Of those, 36 met the case definition and were interviewed: 61% were female; 39% Latino, and 19% Black; median age was 61 years; and 36% lived in high/very high poverty areas. Fifty-eight percent reported ≥1 comorbidity; 35% reported taking antibiotics within 3 months of specimen collection; and 25% had a urinary catheter or indwelling device within 2 days of specimen collection. Only 5 of 15 sequenced isolates clustered with sequences in the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Conclusions: CA-CRO was rare. Patients with a CA-CRO were disproportionately female, non-white, and medically complex. Interviews enhanced eligibility screening and facilitated gathering rich medical and behavioral histories. Despite limited sequencing, the preponderance of non-clustering isolates suggested that coverage of CRO sequences for comparison was limited. The NYC Health Department continues to monitor this public health threat, and clarify factors associated with CRO acquisition, ultimately to help control CRO spread into the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.