ArticleJournal of pregnancy2025
What Is the Most Dangerous Time of Birth for Uncomplicated First-Time Mothers and Their Neonates in a Tertiary Obstetric Center?
Article in Journal of pregnancy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whether the timing of birth affects fetal or maternal outcomes is still controversial. Compared with multiparae, primiparae are a special obstetric group that are more likely to develop labor abnormalities that require intervention. The aim of this study was to investigate the time of delivery and perinatal morbidity with a focus on uncomplicated but first-time pregnancies. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed all births of uncomplicated first-time mothers who intended vaginal delivery. The delivery times were clustered into 2-h intervals and by day of the week. A 5-min Apgar score ≤ 7, an umbilical artery pH value < 7.10, and BE > - 12 were defined as surrogate markers for perinatal morbidity. Other markers examined included the occurrence of a pathological cardiotocogram, the performance of fetal blood analysis via scalp sampling, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), the mode of delivery, or the occurrence of labor arrest. Results: A total of 586 women who intended vaginal delivery were analyzed. The distribution of timepoints of birth divided into 2-h intervals corresponded to a normal distribution ( Conclusions: We detected timepoints when laboratory signs of increased fetal distress were more frequent; although there was no difference in peripartal monitoring, the decision to perform a scalp blood gas analysis or the mode of delivery changed during these periods. On weekends, fetal blood analysis via scalp sampling was carried out less frequently than expected. An increased rate of severe asphyxia or a worse 5-min APGAR was not observed in the neonates at any timepoint. Primiparae should not be underestimated as a supposedly uncomplicated group, as they can present a particular obstetric challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.