ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Impact of prior immunotherapy on paclitaxel/bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapy is becoming essential in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the best treatment sequence remains to be determined. Some data suggest that immunotherapy prior to chemotherapy with paclitaxel/bevacizumab (PB) appears to be an interesting option. Here, we study this sequence in a validation cohort from the Bordeaux Cancer Institute (France). We retrospectively included all patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2015 and 2021, treated with PB directly after immunotherapy (CAI) or without prior exposure to immunotherapy (CWPI). The primary outcome was the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). We included 121 patients: 60 in the CAI group and 61 in the CWPI group. Their characteristics were comparable, even for the main prognostic criteria. The median number of lines received was higher in the CAI group (4 vs. 2). There was a significant difference in TTD (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.72, p = 0.0002), PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.87, p < 0.005), and ORR (58% versus 38%, p < 0.05) between the two groups, as well as a non-statistically significant trend toward better OS (7.40 vs. 3.70 months, HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.52-1.10, p = 0.15). We found a significant difference in TTD, PFS, and ORR for PB after exposure to immunotherapy, with a trend toward better OS. This suggests that sequential treatment with immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy could be an interesting option after first-line treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.