Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220935›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Post-progression outcomes following BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy in myeloma: impact of extramedullary and paramedullary disease.

Ziad Abuhelwa, Fnu Amisha, Wenyi Fan, Gabriel De Avila, Doris K Hansen, Ariel F Grajales-Cruz, Brandon Blue, Omar Castaneda, Hien Liu, Ciara L Freeman and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ziad AbuhelwaH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Fnu AmishaH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Wenyi FanH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Gabriel De AvilaH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Doris K HansenH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Ariel F Grajales-CruzH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Brandon BlueH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Omar CastanedaH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Hien LiuH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Ciara L FreemanH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Taiga NishihoriH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Frederick L LockeH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Kenneth H ShainH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Rachid BazH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Melissa AlsinaH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapies have improved outcomes in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, the majority of patients relapse within 1 to 3 years following treatment. Managing disease progression after CAR T-cell therapy remains a major challenge, particularly in aggressive subtypes including extramedullary disease (EMD) and paramedullary disease (PMD). Real-world data on progression patterns post-CAR T cell therapy and the impact of EMD or PMD on outcomes of patients who relapsed post-CAR T-cell therapy remain scarce. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, we evaluated progression patterns and survival outcomes in 106 MM patients who progressed after commercial CAR T-cell therapy (ide-cel or cilta-cel) between May 2021 and December 2023. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the time of post-CAR T-cell therapy progression to death or last follow-up, and progression-free survival (PFS) from post-CAR T-cell therapy progression to progression on the next line of therapy. Results: Biochemical relapse occurred in 82% of patients, with EMD or PMD present in 51% at progression. Baseline EMD at the time of CAR T-cell infusion was detected in 33% of patients and was associated with significantly inferior PFS (3.6 vs. 7.0 months, p=0.0076) and OS (4.8 vs. 21.0 months, p=0.00086) compared to those without EMD. Similarly, the presence of EMD at progression was associated with shorter PFS (4.7 vs. 8.5 months, p=0.022) and OS (7.4 vs. 21.1 months, p=0.035). Patients who were EMD positive at both baseline and progression had the poorest outcomes. PMD at baseline or progression was not significantly associated with worse survival. Discussion: Our findings highlight that post-CAR T-cell progression in MM is heterogeneous and that EMD confers an adverse prognosis, emphasizing the critical need for imaging surveillance. Strategies such as bridging therapies aimed at reducing tumor burden prior to CAR T-cell infusion or maintenance therapies post-CAR T-cell therapy warrant further investigation to optimize responses and improve long-term survival in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

CAR T-cell therapyextramedullary diseasemultiple myelomaprogressionsurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41220935
PMCPMC12597725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.