ArticleDental research journal2025
Design, implementation, and evaluation of a learning web application for oral and maxillofacial pathology.
Article in Dental research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studying pathology is not a fascinating subject for many students. Today, novel educational methods have received attention worldwide. This study aimed to design an oral and maxillofacial pathology learning application and evaluate its effectiveness on dental students' knowledge of the Isfahan dental faculty. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, after designing a web application, including an oral pathology context (PathoGAME), its effectiveness on 112 junior dental students' knowledge was investigated in 2022. After introducing the application, students were motivated to use the app for learning oral pathology. They were then examined in the midterm and final examinations. Subsequently, their scores on the questions related to the application's contents were compared with the scores of other questions. Finally, students' satisfaction with the application was evaluated. The data were analyzed using SPSS software and paired Results: In the midterm examination, there was no significant difference between the mean score of questions related or unrelated to the application's content among those who had used the application. Furthermore, the mean scores of the related questions for the application users and those who did not, were not significantly different ( Conclusion: Overall, novel educational methods, such as this application, were beneficial for improving students' understanding of pathology. The users' satisfaction was high in utilizing this application, indicating the application's success and confirming its feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.