Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220897›Full record

ReviewJournal of blood medicine2025

Emerging Gene Therapies in Sickle Cell Disease: A Comparative Review of Efficacy and Safety Against Standard Treatments.

Saeed M Kabrah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saeed M KabrahDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2992-8497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited haemoglobinopathy caused by a point mutation in the β-globin gene, resulting in abnormal sickle haemoglobin (HbS) and variable clinical expression ranging from mild to severe. While individuals with sickle cell trait are usually asymptomatic, those with homozygous disease may experience chronic haemolytic anaemia, recurrent vaso-occlusive crises, and progressive organ injury. Current standards of care, including hydroxyurea therapy, chronic blood transfusions, and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), have substantially improved survival and reduced complications. However, each approach has limitations, such as incomplete disease control, toxicity, and limited donor availability. Recent advances in non-myeloablative and haploidentical HSCT have expanded curative options, achieving high survival with minimal graft-versus-host disease, though accessibility and cost remain challenges. Emerging gene therapies, particularly lentiviral vector-mediated gene addition and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, represent major progress by directly targeting the underlying genetic defect. These autologous approaches eliminate donor-related immune risks and have demonstrated durable haemoglobin correction, near-complete resolution of vaso-occlusive events, and encouraging outcomes in stroke prevention. This review synthesises evidence comparing gene therapies with standard treatments, outlining molecular mechanisms, efficacy, safety, and long-term considerations. Key challenges include stem-cell mobilisation, fertility preservation, conditioning toxicity, and equitable access. Early trials show substantial clinical benefit, improved quality of life, and favourable safety profiles. Emerging in vivo editing technologies may further simplify delivery and enhance global accessibility. Integrating gene therapy into evolving standards of care could transform SCD management, offering realistic prospects for durable remission or cure.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas9gene therapyhydroxyurealentiviral vectorsickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID41220897
PMCPMC12599223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.