Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220893›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2025

Surgical Timing After Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Perspectives.

Guna Pratheep Kalanchiam, Joonho Byun, Suk Hyung Kang, Myeong Jin Ko, Subum Lee, Byung-Jou Lee, Woo-Keun Kwon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ultra-early surgery within 12 hours is associated with improved short-term outcomes after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guna Pratheep KalanchiamDivision of Spine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centre, Madurai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5869-4039
Joonho ByunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0687-3286
Suk Hyung KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyunghee University Hospital, Kyunghee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-9754
Myeong Jin KoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Subum LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-8137
Byung-Jou LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-3618
Woo-Keun KwonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0432-8620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) causes severe neurological and functional disability with major socioeconomic impact. The primary trauma initiates ischemia, excitotoxicity, and inflammation, leading to progressive neuronal loss and glial scarring. Early surgical decompression is a key strategy to limit secondary injury and promote recovery, though optimal timing remains debated. Preclinical data consistently favor early intervention, while clinical studies define "early" variably (<8-72 hours). Evidence from multicenter trials and meta-analyses indicates that decompression within 24 hours offers nearly a threefold higher chance of ≥2-grade improvement on the ASIA Impairment Scale, along with better motor recovery, functional independence, and fewer complications. Ultra-early (<8-12 hours) decompression may provide additional benefit in select cases, but supporting data remain limited. The strongest effects are seen in cervical and incomplete injuries, with less consistent results in thoracic and polytrauma cases. Emerging adjuncts such as expansile duraplasty and intraoperative ultrasound may further optimize outcomes. The AO Spine-Praxis guidelines strongly recommend decompression within 24 hours, though global disparities in resources persist. Overall, evidence supports early-preferably within 24 hours-decompression to enhance recovery after acute SCI, with future studies needed to refine timing and standardize protocols worldwide.

Indexed as

DecompressionRecovery of functionSpinal cord injuriesSurgeryTime factors

Identifiers

PMID41220893
PMCPMC12599412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.