ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2025
Surgical Timing After Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Perspectives.
Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultra-early surgery within 12 hours is associated with improved short-term outcomes after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Targeting glial scar formation for spinal cord injury: mechanisms, strategies, and research progress review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) causes severe neurological and functional disability with major socioeconomic impact. The primary trauma initiates ischemia, excitotoxicity, and inflammation, leading to progressive neuronal loss and glial scarring. Early surgical decompression is a key strategy to limit secondary injury and promote recovery, though optimal timing remains debated. Preclinical data consistently favor early intervention, while clinical studies define "early" variably (<8-72 hours). Evidence from multicenter trials and meta-analyses indicates that decompression within 24 hours offers nearly a threefold higher chance of ≥2-grade improvement on the ASIA Impairment Scale, along with better motor recovery, functional independence, and fewer complications. Ultra-early (<8-12 hours) decompression may provide additional benefit in select cases, but supporting data remain limited. The strongest effects are seen in cervical and incomplete injuries, with less consistent results in thoracic and polytrauma cases. Emerging adjuncts such as expansile duraplasty and intraoperative ultrasound may further optimize outcomes. The AO Spine-Praxis guidelines strongly recommend decompression within 24 hours, though global disparities in resources persist. Overall, evidence supports early-preferably within 24 hours-decompression to enhance recovery after acute SCI, with future studies needed to refine timing and standardize protocols worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.