ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2025
Clinical and Radiological Efficacy of Short-Segment
Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does Size Matter? Evaluating the Impact of Intermediate Screw Length in Short-Segment Fixation of Thoracolumbar A3-A4 Fractures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the outcomes of short-segment Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 67 patients grouped into SSF (n=24), LSF (n=22), and corpectomy (n=21). Clinical and radiological parameters were assessed, including pre- and postoperative hemoglobin, numeric rating scale scores, American Spinal Injury Association scale grades, anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), spinal canal encroachment, Cobb angle, local kyphotic angle, operative time, and blood loss. Results: Preoperatively, the corpectomy group demonstrated significantly lower AVBH (49.7%) and greater spinal canal encroachment (64.9%) compared with the SSF (62.6% and 39.9%) and LSF (58.4% and 43.0%) groups ( Conclusion: Severe preoperative AVBH loss (≤54.93%) and spinal canal encroachment (≥54.39%) may serve as practical thresholds for selecting corpectomy to achieve adequate decompression. In contrast, when these parameters are within acceptable ranges, SSF may be preferred in younger patients as it is less invasive, requires shorter operative time, and provides outcomes comparable to LSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.