ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2025
Determination of Diagnosis and Prognosis in Spinal Cord Injury Using Machine Learning.
Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a neurological disorder that leads to long-term disability, significant economic burden, and limited treatment options. Accurate and timely diagnosis, as well as reliable prognosis, are crucial for acute treatment, rehabilitation, and long-term treatment planning. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have demonstrated significant potential to support the diagnostic workflow and predict clinical outcomes in patients with tSCI. For diagnostic purposes, models based on convolutional neural networks trained using magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging showed high accuracy in detecting cord damage and classifying injury severity. A variety of prognostic models, ranging from traditional logistic regression to advanced neural networks and deep learning-based radiomics, have been applied to predict functional recovery, ambulatory status, and survival. Although AI-based approaches generally have better prediction accuracy than conventional methods, several limitations remain, such as limited dataset sizes, heterogeneity across studies, lack of external validation. Future studies should incorporate multicenter collaborations, standardized reporting frameworks, and integration of multimodal data to enhance clinical generalizability and applicability. With further improvements, AI will play a crucial role in supporting clinicians in making decisions about tSCI and in patient rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.