ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2025
State-of-the-Art in Robotic Rehabilitation for Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Literature Review.
Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcutaneous spinal stimulation with upper extremity robotic training in chronic stroke and spinal cord injury: individual neurophysiological and clinical responses.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes severe motor, sensory, and functional impairments, often leading to long-term disability. Conventional rehabilitation is labor-intensive and resource-demanding, whereas robotic rehabilitation enables repetitive, task-specific, and intensive training that promotes neuroplasticity. Evidence from clinical and randomized studies shows that upper limb robotic systems, including end-effector and exoskeleton types, improve motor outcomes, especially in the subacute phase. Moreover, hybrid approaches that integrate functional electrical stimulation or spinal cord stimulation appear to provide additional benefits. For lower extremity rehabilitation, ambulatory exoskeletons such as ReWalk, Ekso, Indego, HAL, Rex, Arke, and HANK have been demonstrated to offer safe and feasible gait training, with reported improvements in walking independence, balance, and stride parameters, although enhancements in gait speed remain modest. Preliminary evidence also suggests that exoskeleton-assisted walking may positively influence bowel and urinary function; however, current data are limited. Overall, robotic rehabilitation appears to be a safe and feasible adjunct to conventional therapy, offering moderate improvements in motor function and quality of life in patients with SCI. Nevertheless, further high-quality clinical trials and the integration of neuromodulatory techniques are required to more clearly establish its efficacy and define its role in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.