Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220885›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2025

State-of-the-Art in Robotic Rehabilitation for Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Literature Review.

Shin Heon Lee, Myeong Jin Ko, Young-Seok Lee, Byung-Jou Lee, Subum Lee, Woo-Keun Kwon, Suk Hyung Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shin Heon LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-1374
Myeong Jin KoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-7753
Young-Seok LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-812X
Byung-Jou LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-3618
Subum LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-8137
Woo-Keun KwonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0432-8620
Suk Hyung KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-9754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes severe motor, sensory, and functional impairments, often leading to long-term disability. Conventional rehabilitation is labor-intensive and resource-demanding, whereas robotic rehabilitation enables repetitive, task-specific, and intensive training that promotes neuroplasticity. Evidence from clinical and randomized studies shows that upper limb robotic systems, including end-effector and exoskeleton types, improve motor outcomes, especially in the subacute phase. Moreover, hybrid approaches that integrate functional electrical stimulation or spinal cord stimulation appear to provide additional benefits. For lower extremity rehabilitation, ambulatory exoskeletons such as ReWalk, Ekso, Indego, HAL, Rex, Arke, and HANK have been demonstrated to offer safe and feasible gait training, with reported improvements in walking independence, balance, and stride parameters, although enhancements in gait speed remain modest. Preliminary evidence also suggests that exoskeleton-assisted walking may positively influence bowel and urinary function; however, current data are limited. Overall, robotic rehabilitation appears to be a safe and feasible adjunct to conventional therapy, offering moderate improvements in motor function and quality of life in patients with SCI. Nevertheless, further high-quality clinical trials and the integration of neuromodulatory techniques are required to more clearly establish its efficacy and define its role in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Dependent ambulationExoskeleton deviceRehabilitationRoboticsSpinal cord injuries

Identifiers

PMID41220885
PMCPMC12599415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.