Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220826›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2025

Differences in severity grading of lung hyperinflation using GLI

Lora Wahab, Wolfram Windisch, Carl-Peter Criée, Michael Dreher, Christian G Cornelissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lora WahabDepartment of Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0680-8876
Wolfram WindischCologne Merheim Hospital, Department of Pneumology, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, gGmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Carl-Peter CriéePractice for Pneumology, Northeim, Germany.
Michael DreherDepartment of Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christian G CornelissenDepartment of Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2021, the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) network recommended new static volume lung function reference equations, setting new normal ranges for lung hyperinflation indices and, as a result, for the classification of lung hyperinflation severity. This study examined how use of the GLI 2021 reference equations affected the detection of lung hyperinflation and the distribution of lung hyperinflation severity based on the lung hyperinflation severity grading scale, which relies on fixed % predicted cut-offs and z-scores. Methods: An analysis was performed on data from 12 535 body plethysmography recordings performed from January 2013 to June 2023. The GLI 2021 and the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) reference equations were used to calculate the z-scores for residual volume (RV), total lung capacity (TLC) and RV/TLC. The % predicted RV/TLC ratios were calculated and the distribution of lung hyperinflation severity grading was assessed. Results: Using % predicted cut-offs, severe lung hyperinflation was observed more frequently using the GLI 2021 reference equation compared with the ECSC reference equation (27% Discussion: The study highlights a significant difference in lung hyperinflation grading using GLI 2021 reference equations, necessitating review of the severity scale when using % predicted cut-offs and z-scores with GLI 2021 reference equations.

Identifiers

PMID41220826
PMCPMC12598609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.