ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Cross-scale detection and cross-crop generalization verification of tomato diseases in complex agricultural environments.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to overcome the key challenges associated with detecting tomato leaf disease in complex agricultural environments, such as leaf occlusion, variation in lesion size and light interference, this study presents a lightweight detection model called ToMASD. This model integrates multi-scale feature decoupling and an adaptive alignment mechanism. The model innovatively comprises a dual-branch adaptive alignment module (TAAM) that achieves cross-scale lesion semantic alignment via a dynamic feature pyramid, a local context-aware gated unit (Faster-GLUDet) that uses a spatial attention mechanism to suppress background noise interference, and a multi-scale decoupling detection head (MDH) that balances the detection accuracy of small and diffuse lesions. On a dataset containing six types of disease under various weather conditions, ToMASD achieves an average precision of 84.3%,.by a margin of 4.7% to 12.1% over thirteen mainstream models. The computational load is compressed to 7.1 GFLOPs. Through the introduction of a transfer learning paradigm, the pre-trained weights of the tomato disease detection model can be transferred to common bean and potato detection tasks. Through domain adaptation layers and adversarial feature decoupling strategies, the domain shift problem is overcome, achieving an average precision of 92.7% on the target crop test set. False detection rates in foggy and strong light conditions are controlled at 6.3% and 9.8%, respectively. This study achieves dual breakthroughs in terms of both high-precision detection in complex scenarios and the cross-crop generalization ability of lightweight models. It provides a new paradigm for universal agricultural disease monitoring systems that can be deployed at the edge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.