Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220776›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Deciphering drought-response in wheat (

Birsen Cevher-Keskin, Yasemin Yıldızhan, A Hediye Sekmen, Rumeysa Fayetorbay, Osman Uğur Sezerman, Buğra Özer, Selma Onarıcı, İsmail Türkan, Mahmut Tör

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wheat Drought Management: A Broader Prospect.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Birsen Cevher-KeskinPlant Molecular Biology and Genetics Laboratory, Life Sciences, Marmara Research Centre, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK), Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Yasemin YıldızhanPlant Molecular Biology and Genetics Laboratory, Life Sciences, Marmara Research Centre, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK), Kocaeli, Türkiye.
A Hediye SekmenDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.
Rumeysa FayetorbayDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Osman Uğur SezermanDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Buğra ÖzerMolecular Biology, Genetics & Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabancı University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Selma OnarıcıPlant Molecular Biology and Genetics Laboratory, Life Sciences, Marmara Research Centre, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK), Kocaeli, Türkiye.
İsmail TürkanDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.
Mahmut TörDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Science and the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wheat ( Materials and Methods: This study investigates transcriptomic responses in root and leaf tissues of three wheat cultivars, Atay 85 (drought-sensitive), Gerek 79 and Müfitbey (drought-tolerant), subjected to 4- and 8-hour shock-dehydration stress. Before RNAseq analysis, biochemical assays were conducted to assess oxidative damage (TBARS) and antioxidant enzyme activities under shock-dehydration stress for three different cultivars. Differential gene expression analysis was performed, and several highly differentially expressed genesincluding TaZFP36, TaMC5, TaGI, TaGLP9-1, and TaFer were selected to validate RNAseq data in both root and leaf tissues of tolerant and sensitive cultivars. Results: Transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct metabolic strategies for drought adaptation. Photosynthesis-related processes, including Photosystem I and II, were broadly downregulated, while extracellular and membrane-associated components were upregulated, reflecting a shift toward stress defence mechanisms. Cultivar-specific responses highlighted diverse adaptation strategies: Atay 85 exhibited severe metabolic suppression and ATP depletion, making it highly vulnerable to drought. Gerek 79 conserved energy by suppressing photosynthesis while enhancing osmoprotective sugar metabolism and reinforcing structural integrity through lignin and flavonoid biosynthesis. Müfitbey demonstrated the most robust drought tolerance by integrating metabolic dormancy, hormonal signalling, and antioxidant defence, characterized by stable CAT activity and elevated SOD activity, which mitigated oxidative damage and preserved photosynthetic stability. Root tissues prioritized metabolic adjustments for oxidative stress reduction and developmental adaptation, while leaf tissues focused on maintaining photosynthesis and limiting protein damage. Functional enrichment analysis indicated significant upregulation of stress-related pathways, including ABA-mediated signalling, protein binding, and cellular metabolic processes in tolerant cultivars. Discussion: This study advances our knowledge of the complex molecular and biochemical responses of wheat with differing tolerance levels, highlighting both key candidate genes and antioxidant defence mechanisms as central to cultivar-specific adaptation strategies. The distinct metabolic strategies observed emphasize the importance of tailored molecular mechanisms in drought tolerance, which can guide future breeding programs aimed at improving wheat resilience under water-limited conditions.

Indexed as

ABA signallingantioxidant enzymesdrought stressmetal ion bindingRNAseqshock- dehydrationTriticum aestivum L.

Identifiers

PMID41220776
PMCPMC12598786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.