ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Stemness-based gastric cancer classification by machine learning for precision diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of ulinastatin on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stemness has been shown to play an important role in immunotherapy and chemotherapy response. Machine learning has been used to predict stemness-based cancer subtypes. We aimed to conduct a stemness-based classification of gastric cancer (GC) for the early identification of patients at risk for GC and guide treatment. Methods: Stemness indices [mRNA stemness index (mRNAsi)] of 389 patients with GC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were generated using one-class logistic regression (OCLR) algorithm. Consensus clustering was performed to divide the patients with GC into two subtypes based on their stemness indices. Finally, four machine learning algorithms were used to construct a logistic regression model containing 12 critical genes. An external cohort was used as the validation cohort. Results: Stemness subtype cluster1 had higher mRNAsi scores and a significantly better prognosis, while stemness subtype cluster2 had higher immunocompetence. In terms of the prediction of therapeutic efficacy, patients in cluster2 may have a better response to anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) therapy, whereas no significant response to anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) therapy was observed in either subtype. The two subtypes showed significant differences in tolerance to chemotherapy. A total of 1,863 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on the stemness signature of GC, of which 12 critical genes were selected to predict the stemness subtype. The consistency of the results in the validation cohort indicated a promising application of this stemness-based classification and predictive model. Conclusions: Our machine learning approach performed an overall analysis of the relationship between the stemness of GC and the therapeutic effect, identified a promising stemness-based classification of GC to predict prognosis and treatment efficacy, and developed a predictive model to make the stemness-based classification accessible for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.