Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220749›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025

Prognostic and safety analysis of capecitabine monotherapy versus CapeOx (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) in elderly patients with high-risk stage II and stage III MRD-negative colorectal cancer.

Jiawei Zhai, Rongjian Tan, Wenting Ou, Zhenhao Quan, Lijun Sun, Xianjin Huang, Jiayuan Wu, Caijin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiawei ZhaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4172-4805
Rongjian TanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Wenting OuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Zhenhao QuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Lijun SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Xianjin HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Jiayuan WuDepartment of Clinical Trials Center, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Caijin ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the optimal regimen for elderly minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative patients remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine monotherapy versus the CapeOx regimen (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 117 elderly patients (aged 65-85 years) with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC who underwent curative surgery and tested MRD-negative. Patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative chemotherapy: capecitabine monotherapy (n=58) and CapeOx (n=59). Baseline characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year DFS rates, and adverse events were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline differences, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess survival outcomes. Results: The median DFS was 31 months in the capecitabine group and 40 months in the CapeOx group (P=0.26). The 3-year DFS rates were comparable (90% Conclusions: Capecitabine monotherapy might provide comparable DFS to CapeOx in elderly MRD-negative CRC patients, with better safety profile. MRD status might guide personalized dose-reduction strategies for elderly patients with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC.

Indexed as

chemotherapyColorectal cancer (CRC)elderly patientminimal residual disease (MRD)prognosis

Identifiers

PMID41220749
PMCPMC12598343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.