ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Safety and efficacy of liver-directed radiotherapy after chemoimmunotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma: an early report from a large tertiary cancer center.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent randomized controlled trials have established chemoimmunotherapy as the standard of care for patients with advanced biliary cancers with a median overall survival (OS) of about thirteen months. No data exist to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of liver-directed radiotherapy (RT) for extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in the era of chemoimmunotherapy. The purpose of this study is to report our early experience treating patients with CCA using RT and chemoimmunotherapy. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with CCA who received chemoimmunotherapy sequentially and/or concurrently with RT were retrospectively analyzed. The median biologic equivalent dose (BED) of RT was 84.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 81.4-98.0] Gy. For each patient, we tabulated demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics, including kinetic assessment of laboratory values. The primary goal was to assess acute and late toxicities. Secondary goals were to measure OS using the Kaplan-Meier method and local control using cumulative incidence curves, considering death as a competing risk for local failure. We explored clinical and pathological associations with outcomes. Results: Most patients (89%) experienced acute low-grade RT toxicities. There were no grade three acute toxicities. Two patients experienced late toxicities potentially attributable to RT. One patient experienced grade two hepatic impairment and another patient experienced grade three pneumonitis. The median OS measured from time of RT completion to death was 17.4 months, and the cumulative incidence of local failure for our patient population was 11% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-26%] at six months, 24% (95% CI: 9.3-43%) at 12 months, and 30% (95% CI: 12-50%) at 24 months. Exploratory analyses indicated that patients whose absolute lymphocyte count recovered faster three months after RT had better survival outcomes [hazard ratio (HR) 0.11 (95% CI: 0.021-0.56, P=0.02)]. Presence of portal vein thrombus (P=0.04) and evidence of liver dysfunction on laboratory values [e.g., increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P=0.005), direct bilirubin (P<0.001), and total bilirubin (P<0.001)] associated with worse OS. Conclusions: RT appears safe for patients with CCA who receive chemoimmunotherapy, with promising survival outcomes. Immune kinetics and other standard clinicopathological features may identify important prognostic differences amongst patients and help guide management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.