Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220715›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Clinical validation of AWGC-defined cachexia in gastric cancer patients: impact on body composition and quality of life.

Yan Huang, Xi Wu, Yan Ge, Chen Wang, Xin Ding, Junbo Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan Huang *Department of Clinical Nutrition, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Xi Wu *Department of Clinical Nutrition, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Yan GeDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Chen WangDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Xin DingDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Junbo ZuoDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) has released consensus criteria for diagnosing cachexia in Asians. Nevertheless, there is limited data regarding the application of these criteria in cancer patients. This study aimed to assess the changes in body composition and quality of life in gastric cancer (GC) patients with cachexia defined by the AWGC criteria. Methods: Body composition parameters were analyzed using CT images at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The diagnosis of cachexia was according to the AWGC criteria and Fearon's criteria. Results: A total of 431 patients with GC was included in this study. Among them, 160 patients (37.1%) were diagnosed with cachexia according to the AWGC criteria and 166 patients (38.5%) were diagnosed with cachexia based on the Fearon's criteria. The agreement between the two criteria for diagnosing cachexia was moderate ( Conclusion: Patients with AWGC-defined cachexia showed significant changes in body composition and was independently associated with poor HRQoL.

Indexed as

body compositioncancer cachexiagastric cancerquality of lifethe Asian Working Group for Cachexia

Identifiers

PMID41220715
PMCPMC12597802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.