Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220707›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Evaluating dietary habits of adults and their relationship with sleep quality in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Nouf A Alghamdi, Arwa S Almasaudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nouf A AlghamdiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Arwa S AlmasaudiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sleep plays a vital role in daily functioning and well-being, yet insufficient sleep is a growing global concern influenced by modern lifestyles. Methods: This study examined the relationship between dietary habits, and sleep quality among 1,041 Saudi adults using self-administered questionnaires, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and a nutrition behavior questionnaire. Results: The key findings included that 77.4% of participants had poor sleep quality (PSQI > 6). Females reported worse sleep efficiency, more disturbances, and greater daytime dysfunction than males. Dietary patterns revealed low consumption of fruits (38.2%), vegetables (28%), fish (38.9%), and legumes (38%), and high consumption of starches (41%), poultry (26.4%), and sweets (29.9%). Positive associations were found between sleep efficiency and fruit, fish, and legume intake, while high starch, sweets, and dairy consumption correlated with poorer sleep quality, longer sleep latency, and increased daytime dysfunction. Gender-specific analysis showed distinct dietary effects. In males, fruits, vegetables, dairy, and legumes improved sleep quality, whereas starches and sweets negatively affected it. In females, sweets negatively affected sleep quality and latency, while fish consumption improved sleep efficiency and reduced dysfunction. Discussion: The study highlights the connection between diet and sleep, suggesting that individualized dietary interventions could help enhance sleep quality. However, limitations, such as self-reported data and confounding factors, call for further research using objective measures.

Indexed as

dietary habitsPSQIsleep durationsleep latencysleep quality

Identifiers

PMID41220707
PMCPMC12597755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.