Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220613›Full record

ArticleACS electrochemistry2025

Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis Using a Catalyst-Coated Membrane Cathode.

Habin Park, Shane Harris, Paul A Kohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS electrochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Habin ParkGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.
Shane HarrisGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.
Paul A KohlGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-3647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) approach to electrode fabrication for high pH water electrolysis offers enhanced interfacial contact between the catalyst layer and the membrane surface in comparison to the catalyst-coated substrate (CCS) electrode configuration. The CCM facilitates enhanced ionic and water transport between the cathode and the anion exchange membrane (AEM). This advantage is particularly significant with AEM water electrolysis (compared to proton exchange membrane water electrolysis) because the cathode typically operates under dry conditions and relies solely on diffusive water transport across the AEM from the liquid-fed anode. This study presents a direct performance comparison between CCS and CCM cathode configurations using identical hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) catalysts and other components. The use of a pseudo-reference electrode integrated into the membrane electrode assembly enabled detailed analysis of the CCM cathode polarization behavior. Surface characterization provided insight into the degradation mechanisms associated with the CCM configuration. Optimization of the cathode ionomer cross-link density improved both the cathode polarization performance and the electrolysis device durability. Further optimization of the HER catalyst loading in the CCM cathode resulted in additional gains in the electrolysis efficiency. Collectively, these findings offer valuable guidance for the design and fabrication of high-performance, durable AEM electrolysis CCMs.

Indexed as

anion-exchange membranecatalyst-coated membranecross-linkingdurabilityWater electrolysis

Identifiers

PMID41220613
PMCPMC12598701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.