ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Serum metabolomics-based diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer: insights and multi-omics validation.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood-based biomarkers of protein digestibility, utilization, and nitrogen excretion in animals: Concepts, evidence, and applications.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Unraveling role of arginine-NO metabolism by targeting HIF-1α signaling in mediating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, primarily due to delayed diagnosis. There is an urgent need for sensitive, noninvasive biomarkers that can facilitate early detection and improve clinical outcomes. Methods: In this study, we performed untargeted metabolomic profiling of serum samples from 715 participants (248 CRC patients and 467 noncancer controls, NCC) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Differential metabolites were identified through statistical filtering and multivariate analysis, followed by pathway enrichment to elucidate biologically relevant dysregulations. Subsequently, machine learning algorithms, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Logistic Regression (LR), were applied to construct predictive models. As a complementary approach, we also profiled cfDNA methylation patterns in a subset of samples and developed a multi-omics classifier integrating metabolite and epigenetic features. Results: We identified 26 CRC-associated serum metabolites, many of which mapped to dysregulated pathways such as primary bile acid biosynthesis and taurine/hypotaurine metabolism, suggesting active reprogramming of host-microbiota metabolic axes in CRC pathogenesis. A metabolomics-based diagnostic model built using ten selected metabolites demonstrated excellent discriminatory performance, achieving area under the receiver operaring characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.96-0.97 and accuracies up to 92.5% across multiple machine learning methods. Integration of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation markers yielded a multi-omics model with slightly enhanced performance (AUROC=0.98), but the gain over the metabolomics-only model was modest. Conclusion: This study reveals distinct serum metabolic signatures and pathway disruptions in CRC patients and presents a high-performance, minimally invasive diagnostic model based solely on metabolomics data. While the integration of methylation features offers incremental benefit, metabolomics remains the dominant predictor, underscoring its potential as a standalone platform for early CRC screening and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.