ArticleJMA journal2025
Effects of Hybrid Education Sequence on Learning Outcomes for Clinical Judgement Development in Nursing Students in the Developing Phase of Readiness.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the effects of the sequence of a hybrid class on learning outcomes for clinical judgment development in nursing students. Methods: This was a quasi-randomized controlled trial. The study participants consisted of 85 second-year nursing university students. The class was conducted in a hybrid format consisting of a simulation of providing nursing care to a patient with diabetes and an on-demand lecture on blood sugar regulation, insulin secretion, and action. The Japanese version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was used to evaluate participants' clinical judgment. The Shapiro-Wilk test confirmed non-normal distribution for all items. The Mann-Whitney U test compared groups with a significance level of p < 0.05. This study was based on the "Development and Validation of Guidelines for Reporting Evidence-Based Practice Educational Interventions and Teaching." Results: No differences were found between the groups at baseline. No differences were found between the groups in achievement based on the LCJR items, total scores, or learning goals after the hybrid class. Conclusions: The results suggest that the sequence of simulations and on-demand lectures for clinical judgment development did not affect LCJR scores or learning goal achievement following a hybrid class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.