Trial reportJMA journal2025
Implications of Palliative Care Screening in Outpatient Comprehensive Cancer Genome Profiling Tests.
Trial report in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Many patients with cancer experience physical and/or psychological distress when undergoing Comprehensive Cancer Genome Profiling (CGP) after being diagnosed with cancer. However, not all of these patients necessarily visit palliative care clinics. This study aimed to clarify the extent to which patients who underwent the CGP test experience physical and emotional distress. Methods: The "Ease of Living Questionnaire" was administered to 75 patients who visited our CGP outpatient clinic between November 2022 and July 2023, and patient backgrounds were investigated. Results: Of the 75 patients, 8 (16%) had physical symptoms graded as ≥3/5, and five had visited a palliative care outpatient clinic. On the other hand, 14 patients (28%) had psychological symptoms graded as ≥6/10, but only eight visited the palliative care outpatient clinic. Conclusions: Several patients who underwent CGP examinations at our hospital experienced physical and psychological distress, suggesting a strong need for palliative care. However, the number of patients who undergo interventions by palliative care physicians is not necessarily high. It is important to take advantage of the fact that CGP outpatient clinics provide sufficient time for healthcare professionals to meet with patients and their families, as well as to seek to connect patients in need of palliative care with appropriate palliative care CGP outpatient clinics in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.